![]() ![]() ![]() I work for an Architecture and Engineering firm with about 100 employees including 2 IT people (myself who handles the typical day to day operations).Īll employees have laptops and most of our infrastructure is cloud-based (Azure, Intune, filesharing. Wasabi - 6/TB/month (does Hetzner bill in Euros, or is it just their site will that be a problem if the exchange rate bumps back up to 1.00:1. Hot Archival Storage Store a lot of files, access them infrequently, but need quick access A common example is video surveillance. It has a more complete feature set than Backblaze B2 or Storj, but has egress limits. Scaleway Glacier - 2/TB/month, 10/TB retrieval fee. Wasabi is another fantastic 'low cost' provider. Hetzner Storage Box BX21 - 5TB only, 12/month. Best, easiest software deployment suite? Software Backblaze B2 - 5/TB/month, 10/TB retrieval fee.Snap! - Deadly Recipes, Mouse Hearing Loss Reversal, Certainty Trap, Free Rides Spiceworks Originalsįlashback: August 11, 2003: The Blaster worm begins to spread, infecting Windows XP and Windows 2000 (Read more HERE.)īonus Flashback: August 11, 1960: First object successfull. Wasabi is a tiny bit more expensive than Backblaze B2 (5.99 vs 5 per TB per month), and there are minimum storage size/time requirements (1TB, 3Mo), but Wasabi has free traffic each month up to the size of storage which can save you a lot of money. Wasabi has a very strong storage offering with a lot of features, bells, and whistles.if 10 machines are connected to a 100 mbps connection and one machine downloads a 1GB file, are the others dead in the water until it finishes? More importantly, why or why not? I'm having trouble findi. We would like to have a Cloud Backup in case all else fails in the current setup that is why we are looking for the best cost effective solution to run a Cloud Backup since this might never be used but something we can depend on if worst comes to worst.Ĭan one machine consume all available bandwidth? Ex. Data per site is between 2-4tb so i would not be able to use OneDrive i believe. You would only actually apply it to the remote mirror if need be - testing notwithstanding.Īll are sites have their own Synology box in which they are backed up using Synology's Hyper Backup. That differential file can be used to roll the remote version forward to the time the file was generated. ![]() The cool thing about rsync is that the bandwidth use can be near zero as you can do a full mirror once a week but generate a differential file each night and export it to a local drive instead of applying the changes over the internet. This is because you will be unable to get one tenth of 1tb of data that stored in the cloud in a timely fashion unless it is being restored to an adjacent platform. Wasabi: Recognition Backblaze and Wasabi are both known for providing exceptional technological solutions. It's not ideal however, unless you plan to perform DR to the cloud that is, restore a failed local instance to a cloud platform. Running a second Synology unit at another site and mirroring changes (using something approaching the efficiency of rsync) will easily be the most economical beyond 1tb - an amount typically included for free with just about every Office 365 subscription. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |